Author Topic: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread  (Read 165116 times)

Offline boredog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1320 on: February 06, 2019, 09:58:21 pm »
Any chance to get the whitelist screen to fullscreen? (what you see is maximised whitelist enabled) When you see stuff like 10+ firefox rules and have to scroll all the way to the right to see which one is from which process is not easy for the eyes :D
VS 4.69 Win 10, 64bit

There is a setting for this but it doesn't do anything that I can see.

It does this...

I wouldn't call that maximizing. You still have to scroll to the side to see everything and that is what happens weather you tick that setting or not.

Offline Andi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • He died for you, why not live for Him?
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1321 on: February 06, 2019, 10:05:51 pm »
Any chance to get the whitelist screen to fullscreen? (what you see is maximised whitelist enabled) When you see stuff like 10+ firefox rules and have to scroll all the way to the right to see which one is from which process is not easy for the eyes :D
VS 4.69 Win 10, 64bit

There is a setting for this but it doesn't do anything that I can see.

It does this...

I wouldn't call that maximizing. You still have to scroll to the side to see everything and that is what happens weather you tick that setting or not.

Yeah I agree but still it does something   ;D
Win10 x64 (1903)
System Security:  Kaspersky free, VoodooShield
Browser Security: AdGuard,Kaspersky Protection

Offline boredog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1322 on: February 06, 2019, 10:10:33 pm »
Can you explain what that setting does? I don't see it.

Offline Andi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • He died for you, why not live for Him?
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1323 on: February 06, 2019, 10:11:40 pm »
Hmm, strange...I set "Autopilot-mode" when install Voodoo v4.72 and only change few minor things (pictures) and after this Voodoo automatically switch to Default (Smart-Aggressive) mode ?!?
Anyone else have that situation?

« Last Edit: February 06, 2019, 10:31:19 pm by Andi »
Win10 x64 (1903)
System Security:  Kaspersky free, VoodooShield
Browser Security: AdGuard,Kaspersky Protection

Offline Andi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • He died for you, why not live for Him?
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1324 on: February 06, 2019, 10:14:34 pm »
Can you explain what that setting does? I don't see it.

Removes this section and gives you a few cm in width.

Win10 x64 (1903)
System Security:  Kaspersky free, VoodooShield
Browser Security: AdGuard,Kaspersky Protection

Offline boredog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1325 on: February 06, 2019, 10:18:16 pm »
I see no difference in ticking that option in the screen shots you posted. I don't see what thos settings have to do with maximizing the white list?

Offline boredog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1326 on: February 06, 2019, 10:20:53 pm »
I use smart mode aggressive

Offline Andi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • He died for you, why not live for Him?
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1327 on: February 06, 2019, 10:24:51 pm »
I see no difference in ticking that option in the screen shots you posted. I don't see what thos settings have to do with maximizing the white list?

It gives you a few cm in width.

Small but still better than nothing  ;D
I would like to see variable window size and maximazing button.
Maybe we will see that practical change in v5.0 ?
« Last Edit: February 06, 2019, 10:36:57 pm by Andi »
Win10 x64 (1903)
System Security:  Kaspersky free, VoodooShield
Browser Security: AdGuard,Kaspersky Protection

Offline boredog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1328 on: February 06, 2019, 10:26:34 pm »
Yes I will wait and see what Dan says.

Thanks

Offline Andi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • He died for you, why not live for Him?
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1329 on: February 06, 2019, 11:14:14 pm »
Again I set Voodoo to Autopilot-mode and after some time Voodoo revert's back to Smart-mode!?!
This time I did not change anything additionall in settings.
Win10 x64 (1903)
System Security:  Kaspersky free, VoodooShield
Browser Security: AdGuard,Kaspersky Protection

Offline gorblimey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1330 on: February 07, 2019, 06:24:20 am »
I wouldn't call that maximizing. You still have to scroll to the side to see everything and that is what happens weather you tick that setting or not.

Also, the Close Window "X" is less than intuitive: newbies will be wondering why they have to close VS just to get the menu back...  This is awkward to use, so I never have.
____________________
Win7 HPx64 SP1, VoodooShield, WFC

Offline gorblimey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1331 on: February 07, 2019, 06:39:03 am »
This morning I got an alert about Dropbox and "qtwebengineprocess.exe", which I allowed.  FWIW, WFC also asked permission for that to phone out, which I also allowed.  It's the green highlighted entry at top of list.

But later, with the pressure off, I thought I'd take a shufti in the User Log and do some forensics.  Except the User Log thinks that VS Auto Allowed "qtwebengineprocess.exe"...  Quite often I get this, where I Allow something in respose to an alert, but the User Log and other places say VS allowed it.  This makes forensics more difficult than need be, especially when you might be sussing what happened 2 or 3 days ago, or looking back to see if a history exists.

"User Allowed" entries should be in Orange or maybe Magenta to quickly find them.  Even just bolding the entry would be sufficient.
____________________
Win7 HPx64 SP1, VoodooShield, WFC

Offline Baldrick

  • Visiting Experts
  • Youngling
  • *
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1332 on: February 09, 2019, 04:44:01 pm »
Well, I am getting bored...running v4.72...and not a single issue found...makes one wish that there was more to test.

Dan, only joking...do not want to encourage any more hard work...you have already done enough of that since the earlier years of v1.

Well, your app is purring and I would not have a system be without it...end of.

Regards, Baldrick

Offline oldschool

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1333 on: February 09, 2019, 08:03:35 pm »
I have to agree. Running smooth, no issues. Irreplaceable!  8)
"... still trying to find the answers to life's persistent questions..." - Guy Noir, Private Eye

W10 1903 Bitdefender Free + VoodooShield Pro

Offline Shmu26

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: VoodooShield v4 STABLE Thread
« Reply #1334 on: February 11, 2019, 02:46:30 pm »
Dan, is it feasible to add Process ID to the User log? Maybe it's in there already and I just don't see it.
Let's say I get a suspicious process that was parented by svchost, for instance. As there are lots of svchosts running simultaneously, I don't know which one was the parent, and what spawned that particular instance of svchost. That's why PID can help to take the mystery out of things.